<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government to relax planning rules for change of use from commercial to residential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mablaw.com/2012/08/government-to-relax-planning-rules-for-change-of-use-from-commercial-to-residential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2012/08/government-to-relax-planning-rules-for-change-of-use-from-commercial-to-residential/</link>
	<description>MAB</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Temple</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2012/08/government-to-relax-planning-rules-for-change-of-use-from-commercial-to-residential/comment-page-1/#comment-6012</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Temple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=20846#comment-6012</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, if you have a mixed use property, ie: shop on ground floor and offices above these changes do not apply as I have found to my cost.

I don&#039;t think that this is what was intended, especially with the &quot;regeneration of the High Street headlines&quot; 

It appears to me that this has been rushed through and not thought out properly. An opportunity missed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, if you have a mixed use property, ie: shop on ground floor and offices above these changes do not apply as I have found to my cost.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that this is what was intended, especially with the &#8220;regeneration of the High Street headlines&#8221; </p>
<p>It appears to me that this has been rushed through and not thought out properly. An opportunity missed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
