<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Arnold &#38; Baldwin LLP &#124; Giving you a lot more than just law... &#187; HIPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mablaw.com/category/sectors/hips-sectors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mablaw.com</link>
	<description>MAB</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:44:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Coalition government &#8211; how will this affect residential property?</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/05/coalition-government-residential-property/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/05/coalition-government-residential-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Neilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying a New Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord & Tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plot Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling your Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy-to-let]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Information Pack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homebuy Direct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=3597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Similarities are notable between the Conservative and Liberal Democrat manifestos, which can be used to interpret what impact this Government is likely to have on Property.
The first similarity was clearly the plan to abolish Home Information Packs before a property could be sold. The Liberal Democrats did however wish to retain the Energy Performance Certificate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Similarities are notable between the Conservative and Liberal Democrat manifestos, which can be used to interpret what impact this Government is likely to have on Property.</p>
<p>The first similarity was clearly the plan to abolish Home Information Packs before a property could be sold. The Liberal Democrats did however wish to retain the Energy Performance Certificate element of the packs. As of today (21 May), this plan has been implemented following the announcement by the Government for their immediate suspension. This would seem to be a sensible move by the Government; many had predicted this move and could therefore have had the effect of sellers withholding their properties from the market, hoping to save the cost of the Home Information Pack. This move will certainly be welcomed by residential developers and sellers alike, and hopefully bring back some spontaneity to the market.</p>
<p>A second point on which both parties are agreed is for a more localised planning policy. The Conservatives want to see a new &#8220;open source&#8221; policy, with local people being able to specify what type of development they want. The Liberal Democrats want local authorities to determine how and what type of developments are carried out. These proposals are in line with a clear intention to scrap the previous Government’s housebuilding targets, which many commentators state to be unrealistic based on current levels of construction. Whether a more local planning policy will help developers in obtaining planning for developments remains to be seen. One move which developers may not be so keen on is a Conservative proposal to force developers to pay a tariff to local authorities as compensation for the loss of amenities and costs of additional infrastructure.</p>
<p>The Conservatives proposal to permanently scrap Stamp Duty Land Tax for first-time buyers on properties priced under £250,000 may help the lower end of the market. Whilst this is likely to be welcome news, its effectiveness could be watered down by the scaling down of schemes such as Homebuy Direct, which has been suggested by the Liberal Democrats. This scheme has been of assistance to a number of developers and purchasers alike during challenging times.</p>
<p>There has also been much news on plans to increase the rate of Capital Gains Tax, currently at 18 per cent, and thought to be likely to increase to at least 40 per cent. This is not just likely to hit property investors and people investing in property to fund their retirement, but potentially also people who had lost confidence in pensions and may not have made separate provisions. However, if this has the effect of putting off potential buy-to-let investors from entering the market, then this could see an upturn in rental incomes as demand outstrips supply for rental properties.</p>
<p>Clearly, some uncertainty remains as we wait to see whether any such plans are watered down following consultation and the parliamentary process.  </p>
<p> </p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/05/coalition-government-residential-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Information Packs suspended</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/05/home-information-packs-suspended/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/05/home-information-packs-suspended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying a New Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plot Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling your Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Performance Certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Information Pack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=3569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government has announced that, from 21 May 2010, it is suspending the requirement for homeowners to provide a Home Information Pack (HIP) when selling their homes. The Government will need to introduce legislation to outlaw them completely.
HIPs were introduced in England and Wales in 2007, with the aim of speeding up the home selling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government has announced that, from 21 May 2010, it is suspending the requirement for homeowners to provide a Home Information Pack (HIP) when selling their homes. The Government will need to introduce legislation to outlaw them completely.</p>
<p>HIPs were introduced in England and Wales in 2007, with the aim of speeding up the home selling process by requiring sellers to provide a lot of the conveyancing information when their properties are first put up for sale.</p>
<p>We at Matthew Arnold and Baldwin believe that the suspension of HIPs will lead to a more efficient and less expensive property transaction experience for both buyers, sellers and developers, which is something we would always support. HIPs often duplicated expenses and led to a great deal of uncertainty. Although sellers will still be required to commission an Energy Performance Certificate, this will not delay the marketing process, as it will not need to be completed prior to marketing. This is likely to mean that more properties will be placed on the market, as there will be no cost or time barrier to prevent marketing. We will, of course, continue to assist both private sellers and developers in the area in all property matters.</p>
<p>To read further comment by Richard on the suspension of HIPs, please click <a href="http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/business/businessnews/8177085.Home_information_pack_suspension__will_stimulate_housing_market_/">here</a> (taken from the <em>Watford Observer</em> website).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/05/home-information-packs-suspended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing: where do the main political parties stand?</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/04/housing-labour-conservative-liberal-manifesto-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/04/housing-labour-conservative-liberal-manifesto-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karin Holt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying a New Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plot Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling your Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=3231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the general election only a matter of days away, this briefing looks at what the three main political parties have proposed for the housing sector in their recent policy statements and election manifestos. We discuss some of the main proposals below and assess the possible implications their proposals may have on the sector.
 Labour

Build up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the general election only a matter of days away, this briefing looks at what the three main political parties have proposed for the housing sector in their recent policy statements and election manifestos. We discuss some of the main proposals below and assess the possible implications their proposals may have on the sector.</p>
<p> <strong>Labour</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Build up to 10,000 new council homes a year by 2014/15;</li>
<li>Maintain the HomeBuy Direct scheme;</li>
<li>Maintain the stamp duty threshold at £125,000, but (1) abolish it for people in home ownership schemes, and (2) scrap it for two years for first-time buyers on homes worth up to £250,000;</li>
<li>Ensure that all new homes will be zero carbon by 2016;</li>
<li>Maintain Home Information Packs;</li>
<li>Maintain the standard interest rate on the Support for Mortgage Interest Scheme at 6.08 per cent until December 2010;</li>
<li>Give more powers to local authorities to manage the developments of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), particularly where HMOs affect the composition of local communities;</li>
<li>Crack down on social housing tenants who fraudulently sub-let their properties;</li>
<li>Develop a new form of affordable housing for families on modest incomes who don’t qualify for social housing (e.g. allow them to rent an affordable home at below market rates while they build up an equity stake);</li>
<li>Give tenants who rent from a private landlord the right to a written tenancy agreement;</li>
<li>Establish a new National Landlord Register.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Conservatives</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Scrap national and regional housebuilding targets, but reward those local authorities who build more homes by allowing them to keep more of the proceeds from council tax and business rates;</li>
<li>Create Local Housing Trusts to develop homes for local people (if there is strong community backing for this);</li>
<li>Expand the self-build sector, particularly in rural areas &#8211; local authorities will have to set up a register of families who want to join a self-build scheme and then assess how much land needs to be put aside for a self-build community to be set up.</li>
<li>Allow neighbourhoods to stop the practice of ‘garden grabbing’;</li>
<li>Permanently scrap stamp duty for first-time buyers on homes up to £250,000;</li>
<li>Abolish Home Information Packs;</li>
<li>Give social tenants with five years good behaviour a 10 per cent equity stake in their properties;</li>
<li>Pilot a new ‘right to move’ scheme and introduce a nationwide social home swap programme, so social tenants can transfer their tenancy to another home in any part of the country;</li>
<li>Introduce a new ‘open source’ planning system, so that local people can specify what kind of development they want to see in their area;</li>
<li>Force developers to pay a tariff to local authorities as compensation for the loss of any amenities and costs of additional infrastructure;</li>
<li>Abolish the power of planning inspectors to rewrite local plans;</li>
<li>Amend the ‘Use Classes Order’, so that people can use buildings for any purpose allowed in the local plan;</li>
<li>Limit appeals against local planning decisions to cases that involve abuse of process or failure to apply the local plan.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Liberal Democrats</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Scrap regional housebuilding targets and allow local authorities to determine how many and what type of homes are needed in their area;</li>
<li>Bring 250,000 empty homes back into use by offering grants and cheap loans to their owners to renovate them &#8211; grants if the home is for social housing, loans if the home is for private use;</li>
<li>Build tens of thousands of affordable houses to rent;</li>
<li>Ensure council houses sold under the ‘Right to Buy’ scheme are replaced;</li>
<li>Allow local authorities to keep 100 per cent of the capital receipts from ‘Right to Buy’ sales;</li>
<li>Create a new ‘Safe Start’ mortgage that protect buyers from negative equity;</li>
<li>&#8220;Scale back&#8221; Homebuy Direct schemes;</li>
<li>Offer “green loans” for people to invest in home energy efficiency and micro-renewables;</li>
<li>Scrap Home Information Packs, but retain energy performance certificates;</li>
<li>Create a third-party right of appeal in cases where planning decisions go against locally agreed plans;</li>
<li>Stop major new housing developments in major flood risk areas;</li>
<li>Promote schemes for affordable homes, such as equity mortgages and ‘Home on the Farm’ which encourage farmers to convert existing buildings into affordable housing;</li>
<li>introduce a new planning &#8216;use class&#8217; for second homes, so that communities and local authorities can control the number of homes given over to holidaymakers.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p>The Home Information Packs (HIPs) have not been particularly popular with sellers, estate agents, developers or conveyancers, and there is a general feeling that they have not actually achieved what they were introduced to do, which was to speed up the process of buying and selling properties, although the HIP industry comments that they believe it has. The Conservatives say that they will abolish them, but the shadow housing minister Grant Shapps has not said what he will replace them with. The Liberal Democrats are saying that they will abolish them but retain the Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs). There is obviously concern in the HIP industry as to how this will affect them and they are urging the new government to adapt not scrap HIPs. Thousands of people trained to be Energy Assessors and the HIP industry employs a lot of people.</p>
<p>Apparently sellers are also delaying putting their properties on the market until after the election to see what actually happens. However, whichever party or parties do take over, the decision will not be an instant one, so are sellers going to carry on waiting indefinitely? I am sure we all want to see an upturn rather than a stall in the housing market.</p>
<p>The Labour government’s first-time buyer relief on properties up to £250,000 for two years is good news for first-time buyers, but is difficult for conveyancers to “police”. Clients could tell us that they are first-time buyers when they have actually owned a property previously anywhere in the world, and we have no way of checking and have to rely on their honesty. The Conservatives say that they will permanently scrap this for first-time buyers, which will presumably not encourage first-time buyers to get on the property ladder as soon as possible, thereby assisting the market to pick up after the recent slump.</p>
<p>The HomeBuy Direct schemes have been extremely popular in the recession, which Labour want to encourage, but the Liberal Democrats want to “scale back”, although they have other schemes in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/04/housing-labour-conservative-liberal-manifesto-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget 2010 &#8211; Stamp Duty changes</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/03/budget-2010-stamp-duty-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/03/budget-2010-stamp-duty-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shimon Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying a New Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying a new home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling your home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stamp duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stamp Duty Land Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=2798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst I am slightly loathe to post a pre-budget rumour this one is sufficiently headline grabbing to warrant some attention.
The BBC have reported that Chancellor Alistair Darling is to announce in the Budget that stamp duty will be scrapped on house purchases up to £250,000 for first-time buyers.
Why the Treasury would drip feed info like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I am slightly loathe to post a pre-budget rumour this one is sufficiently headline grabbing to warrant some attention.</p>
<p>The BBC have reported that Chancellor Alistair Darling is to announce in the Budget that stamp duty will be scrapped on house purchases up to £250,000 for first-time buyers.</p>
<p>Why the Treasury would drip feed info like this when there is going to be a Budget in a couple of hours, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p><strong>Update </strong></p>
<p>The Chancellor has confirmed that this measure will be implemented plus stamp duty is incresing to 5% on properties over £1m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/03/budget-2010-stamp-duty-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Information Packs – a basic guide for developers</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/02/home-information-packs-basic-guide-for-developers-milton-keynes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/02/home-information-packs-basic-guide-for-developers-milton-keynes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Helen Chaproniere</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling your Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code for Sustainable Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=2309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Home Information Pack or HIP is defined under section 148(2) of the Housing Act 2004 as “a collection of documents relating to the property or the terms on which it is or may become available for sale.”
The information required in a HIP for new build homes is very similar to that required for older [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Home Information Pack or HIP is defined under section 148(2) of the <em>Housing Act 2004</em> as “a collection of documents relating to the property or the terms on which it is or may become available for sale.”</p>
<p>The information required in a HIP for new build homes is very similar to that required for older homes. However, you will need to ensure that you consider whether the property is being sold off-plan and then take this into account with the information contained in the HIP. For example, with properties sold off-plan you will be unable to obtain an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC), as these can only be produced on properties that are available for inspection. Therefore, you will need to provide a Predicted Energy Assessment (PEA). The PEA will be based upon the specifications for the property and should be upgraded to an EPC once the property is build complete and it has still not been sold.</p>
<p>A new home is defined in the <em>Home Information Pack (No. 2) Regulations 2007</em> as a home that is being designed or constructed, or a home that has been constructed but that has never been occupied. This definition does not include converted properties.</p>
<p><strong>What a new home HIP must contain</strong></p>
<p> A new home HIP must contain the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>An index;</li>
<li>A Property Information Questionnaire (specific to the plot);</li>
<li>An EPC or PEA;</li>
<li>A Code for Sustainable Homes certificate or interim certificate;</li>
<li>A sale statement;</li>
<li>Evidence of the title;</li>
<li>A copy of the proposed lease (if selling a leasehold property); and</li>
<li>Searches – local search and standard water search.</li>
</ol>
<p>Developers are unable to begin the marketing of a property until all of the required elements of the HIP have been requested and paid for (or at least a commitment to pay for them has been made.) You must also have the basic HIP information available before marketing a property. The basic information required for marketing are the index, Property Information Questionnaire, EPC/PEA, sustainability certificate, sale statement and evidence of title. Once this information has been complied, the HIP is ready to market, albeit not a complete HIP. You then have 28 days in which to ensure that the completed HIP is available.</p>
<p><strong>When is a new home HIP required?</strong></p>
<p>If you sell the plots on a development individually, they will each require a HIP. However, if you are selling completed dwellings to another developer then you will not normally require a HIP, as you have not offered the property for sale on the open market. You will, however, still require an EPC for each plot sold as a completed dwelling.</p>
<p>Sales to a registered social landlord are also generally exempt but the regulations on this are far from straightforward.</p>
<p>Should you sell a portfolio of properties, these are generally exempt from HIP requirements under regulation 30 of the <em>Home Information Pack (No. 2) Regulations 2007</em>. For example, if you sell two or more properties to an investor under a single or multiple contracts, and indicate within the terms of the sale that you would not have accepted their offer on the properties in isolation and make this clear when marketing, then no HIPs are required for the subject properties. There is also no HIP requirement for mixed-sales under these Regulations.</p>
<p>Only homes marketed to the public require a HIP, even if the home is offered on a shared-ownership or shared-equity basis.</p>
<p><strong>Code for Sustainable Homes</strong></p>
<p>From 1<sup>st</sup> May 2008, where the local authority has received a building notice, initial notice or full plans application the new homes involved must have a Code rating. The Code uses nine categories for measuring the sustainability of a new home. However, assessing a property against the Code is not compulsory, but you must ensure that the HIP either contains a nil-rated certificate if the home has not been assessed, or if the home has been assessed against the Code then a rating must be included.</p>
<p><strong>Availability of the HIP</strong></p>
<p>Any potential buyers are entitled to a copy of the HIP or any part thereof if they request the same. You have 14 days from the request in which to provide them with the information, and you should make no charge for providing the information to them unless they request the same in paper form. You can then make a reasonable charge for copying and postage.</p>
<p>Whilst you are marketing the property continuously there are no requirements for you to update any of the information contained within the HIP, except that you must replace the PEA with an EPC should the property be completed prior to sale.</p>
<p>The legislation surrounding HIPs can be very complex and this article simply scratches the surface. If you have any questions regarding the legislation relating to a particular development or new home then please do not hesitate to contact me on <a href="mailto:helen.chaproniere@mablaw.co.uk">helen.chaproniere@mablaw.co.uk</a> and I will be happy to help and advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/02/home-information-packs-basic-guide-for-developers-milton-keynes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
