<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Arnold &#38; Baldwin LLP &#124; Giving you a lot more than just law... &#187; charity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mablaw.com/tag/charity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mablaw.com</link>
	<description>MAB</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Charities Act to be reviewed</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2011/11/charities-act-review-lord-hodgson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2011/11/charities-act-review-lord-hodgson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Iain Donaldson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity Commisision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Hodgson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=17139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government announced last week that Conservative peer Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts will lead the review of the Charities Act 2006. The aim of the review is to: * Understand how the Act is operating in practice; * Assess how effective it is; and * Determine whether the legal and regulatory framework for charities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government announced last week that Conservative peer Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts will lead the review of the <em>Charities Act 2006</em>.</p>
<p>The aim of the review is to:</p>
<p>* Understand how the Act is operating in practice;</p>
<p>* Assess how effective it is; and</p>
<p>* Determine whether the legal and regulatory framework for charities in England and Wales is fit for purpose, now and in the future, and whether further improvements could be made.</p>
<p>The <em>Charities Act 2006</em> made a number of changes to the legal framework for charities, but Parliament agreed that the Act should be reviewed after it had been in force for five years, so it could assess whether it was an effective piece of legislation.  </p>
<p>The review’s <a href="http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Review%20of%20the%20Charities%20Act%202006%20–%20terms%20of%20reference%20(pdf,%2056kb).pdf">Terms of Reference</a> include 14 specific issues that need to be considered, which were brought to the attention of the Government by the charity sector, lawyers and other interested parties. These include the following:</p>
<p>1. The definition of “charity” and the changes made by the Act in relation to the public benefit requirement;</p>
<p>2. The licensing regime for public charitable collections – are the Act’s provisions workable and do they represent value for money?;</p>
<p>3. UK cross-border issues;</p>
<p>4. Self-regulation of fundraising (as delivered by the Fundraising Standards Board (FRSB));</p>
<p>5. The success of the First-tier Tribunal (Charity), particularly the range of Charity Commission decisions that are appealable to, or reviewable by, the Tribunal;</p>
<p>6. Measures to reduce bureaucracy on charities;</p>
<p>7. The objectives, functions and structure of the Charity Commission, including relevant recommendations from its strategic review;</p>
<p>8. Measures to facilitate social investment or &#8220;mixed purpose&#8221; investment by, and into, charities;</p>
<p>9. The operation of the charity merger provisions in the Act;</p>
<p>10. Exempt charities, including the policy approach to the regulation of exempt charities;</p>
<p>11. The transparency and accountability of the charity sector, including current accounting and reporting/audit procedures;</p>
<p>12. Thresholds for registration of charities, including the £5,000 general registration threshold and the £100,000 registration threshold for excepted charities;</p>
<p>13. The effectiveness of organisational forms available to charities, including the Charitable Incorporated Organisation; and</p>
<p>14. Methods of supporting and encouraging individuals to volunteer as trustees, recognising concerns about trustee liability.</p>
<p>Full details are <a href="http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Review%20of%20the%20Charities%20Act%202006%20–%20terms%20of%20reference%20(pdf,%2056kb).pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>Lord Hodgson is to publish a call for evidence from charities and other stakeholders in due course. He aims to complete his review before summer 2012, and a report will then be laid before Parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2011/11/charities-act-review-lord-hodgson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation on charitable giving in wills</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2011/06/charitable-giving-in-wills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2011/06/charitable-giving-in-wills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shimon Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trust Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deeds of variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inheritance Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=10287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For deaths on or after 6 April 2012, estates that include charitable legacies of at least 10% of the net estate will benefit from a 36% inheritance tax (IHT) rate. The key points are as follows:  The charitable legacy must be left to a body that is a charity for UK tax purposes, that is, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For deaths on or after 6 April 2012, estates that include charitable legacies of at least 10% of the net estate will benefit from a 36% inheritance tax (IHT) rate.</p>
<p><strong>The key points are as follows:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> The charitable legacy must be left to a body that is a charity for UK tax purposes, that is, a charity or other organisation in the UK, European Union Member State, Iceland or Norway that would be a charity under the law of England and Wales OR settled in trust to be used for charitable purposes only OR left to a Community Amateur Sports Club.</li>
<li>Beneficiaries of a will or intestacy may execute a deed of variation to make a charitable legacy.</li>
<li>A beneficiary inheriting joint property by survivorship may divert all or part of that property to charity and the estate will benefit from the IHT incentive. </li>
<li>Where a discretionary trust is set up by will and there are charitable beneficiaries, a distribution within 2 years of death to charity will be treated by HMRC as though it was a legacy made under the will.  </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Points for Consultation</strong></p>
<p>The Consultation Paper of 10 June 2011 “A new incentive for charitable legacies – A lower rate of inheritance tax when leaving 10% of an estate to charity” seeks views on a number of detailed issues including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Whether, for administrative convenience, only charitable gifts of easily realised assets such as cash, land, buildings or quoted shares should count towards the 10% limit.</li>
<li>How assets that are charged to inheritance tax on the deceased’s death in addition to his or her own ‘free estate’ should be treated. These assets would include those that the deceased had given away with a reservation of benefit, particular life interests in settled property and any jointly-owned property that has passed outside of the deceased’s will or intestacy.</li>
</ul>
<p>Comments are invited by 31 August 2011.</p>
<p>Below is an example given by HMRC of an estate which is valued at £850,000 and where the available nil-rate band is £325,000. The minimum charitable legacy to pass the 10% test would be calculated as follows:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="130" valign="top"><strong>Now</strong></td>
<td width="151" valign="top"><strong>From April 2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="130" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="151" valign="top"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">Estate Value</td>
<td width="130" valign="top">£850,000</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">£850,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">Less charitable legacy</td>
<td width="130" valign="top">-£52,500</td>
<td width="151" valign="top"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">Less available nil rate band</td>
<td width="130" valign="top">-£325,000</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">-£325,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">Net estate for 10% test purposes</td>
<td width="130" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="151" valign="top">£525,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">Less minimum charitable legacy to pass 10% test</td>
<td width="130" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="151" valign="top">£52,500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">Taxable estate</td>
<td width="130" valign="top">£472,500</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">£472,500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">IHT due</td>
<td width="130" valign="top">£189,000 (@40%)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">£170,100 (@36%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="130" valign="top"> </td>
<td width="151" valign="top"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="358" valign="top">The amount left for distribution to non-charitable beneficiaries, (i.e. the estate value less any charitable legacy and IHT due) would be:</td>
<td width="130" valign="top"> </p>
<p>£608,500</td>
<td width="151" valign="top"> </p>
<p>£627,400</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Planning points</strong></p>
<p>If you would like to include a charitable legacy in your will or to discuss the impact of the changes, please contact a member of our Wealth Management team on 01923 20 20 20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2011/06/charitable-giving-in-wills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music no longer free for charities</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/12/music-free-charities-copyright-ppl-prs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/12/music-free-charities-copyright-ppl-prs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Weston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upload-IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1998]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright licence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licence fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=6235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charities and not-for-profit organizations will need to get a licence to play copyrighted music from Phonographic Performance Limited and PRS for Music, which together collect and distribute royalties on behalf of copyright holders such as composers, lyricists, music publishers, record companies and musicians. The current law, under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, allows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charities and not-for-profit organizations will need to get a licence to play copyrighted music from Phonographic Performance Limited and PRS for Music, which together collect and distribute royalties on behalf of copyright holders such as composers, lyricists, music publishers, record companies and musicians.</p>
<p>The current law, under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, allows charities and not-for-profit organizations to play copyrighted music in public without paying a licence fee. However, this law is to be changed on 1 January 2011, and from that date a licence will be needed, although the cost of this licence is expected to be low.</p>
<p>Grace periods of one year will be available to ensure compliance is possible. For the Intellectual Property Office press release on this, click <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.ipo.gov.uk/about/press/press-release/press-release-2010/press-release-20101108.htm"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">here</span></a></span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/12/music-free-charities-copyright-ppl-prs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 coming into force (developers/landowners &#8211; don&#8217;t stop reading here, it is explained!)</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/perpetuities-and-accumulations-act-2009-developers-landowners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/perpetuities-and-accumulations-act-2009-developers-landowners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karin Holt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landowners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre-emption Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=1804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 (PAA 2009) received Royal Assent on 12 November 2009 and will come into force on 6 April 2010. From 6 April 2010, the rule against perpetuities will only apply to those interests set out in the PAA 2009. These are generally trust interests (except pension schemes and inter-charity dispositions). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009</em> (PAA 2009) received Royal Assent on 12 November 2009 and will come into force on 6 April 2010.</p>
<p>From 6 April 2010, the rule against perpetuities will only apply to those interests set out in the PAA 2009. These are generally trust interests (except pension schemes and inter-charity dispositions). Interests such as easements (legal rights), restrictive covenants (restrictions on use of property), options and pre-emption rights will no longer be subject to the rule against perpetuities.</p>
<p>From my many years of experience, I know that the majority of people we have dealt with do not know what a perpetuity period is (and why should they?) Our property and trust lawyers here often have to explain, and buyers regularly confuse it with a leasehold term of years.</p>
<p>The original rule was intended to prevent certain rights in property being tied up indefinitely and therefore the previous legislation set the maximum period at 80 years, although often the period was less, for example 21 years.</p>
<p>The fact that the perpetuity period is abolished for options could particularly be of use for option agreements, as they will have a longer life span. This could be of assistance to landowners and developers.</p>
<p>For developers doing plot sales, as interests such as easements and restrictive covenants will no longer be subject to the rule against perpetuities, their legal documentation will need amending from April and obviously we at Matthew Arnold &amp; Baldwin LLP will be preparing for this.</p>
<p>For information on how this will affect trusts and accumulations, I will leave this to my expert colleagues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/perpetuities-and-accumulations-act-2009-developers-landowners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government proposes abolition of copyright exemptions for charities and not-for-profit organisations that want to play music…</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2009/12/government-proposes-abolition-of-copyright-exemptions-for-charities-and-not-for-profit-organisations-that-want-to-play-music%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2009/12/government-proposes-abolition-of-copyright-exemptions-for-charities-and-not-for-profit-organisations-that-want-to-play-music%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gershlick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upload-IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-for-profit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mab.staging.headshift.com/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government has proposed the abolition of the current exemptions for charities and not-for-profit organisations that want to play music. Currently, the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 have certain exemptions provided that certain criteria are met. Last year, the Intellectual Property Office consulted on what to do with those exemptions. The Government has now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government has proposed the abolition of the current exemptions for charities and not-for-profit organisations that want to play music. Currently, the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 have certain exemptions provided that certain criteria are met. Last year, the Intellectual Property Office consulted on what to do with those exemptions. The Government has now announced that its preferred option is their repeal. This was on the basis that the current position is very complex and has not worked well. It wants to move towards a simplified procedure for licensing, which in turn could mean that licence costs would be kept to a low, flat fee. There is also a proposal that the PPL (a collecting society for performers and record companies in the sound recordings) and PRS (a collecting society for owners of the music and lyrics) join forces when collecting royalties from charities and not-for-profit organisations. PPL and PRS have agreed to the single fee and collection point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2009/12/government-proposes-abolition-of-copyright-exemptions-for-charities-and-not-for-profit-organisations-that-want-to-play-music%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

