Latest news and views tagged consent
RSS
Orifarm were parallel importers of Merck’s pharmaceutical products, importing products that had been legitimately put onto the market of another European Union Member State. Merck objected to the fact...
Former T-Mobile employees given record fine for illegal trade in customer data – R v Hames and Turley, Chester Crown Court
Two former employees of the T-Mobile have been fined £73,000 and given suspended prison sentences for the illegal trade in the phone giant’s customer data. Hames sold personal data to another Turley,...
Oral licensee of Community Trade Mark can sue for infringement – Jean Christian Perfumes Ltd v Thakrar, High Court
The High Court has ruled that an oral licensee of a European Community Trade Mark (CTM) can issue proceedings for infringement if the owner of the CTM gives its consent.
In this case, the owner and...
Article 29 Working Party leaves geo-location service providers disorientated after strict data protection opinion about geo-location data
The Article 29 Working Party has concluded an opinion on geo-location services on smart mobile devices (such as smart phones and tablet computers) by saying that they are linked to natural persons and...
NEWSFLASH: New law comes into force requiring user consent when using cookies (updated 26 May)
A new law (the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) (Amendment) Regulations 2011) comes into force on 26 May requiring website operators to obtain consent of their users when placing cookies...
Facebook security flaw allows advertisers to see users’ personal data
Facebook has suffered an embarrassing security flaw in which advertisers have been able to see users’ accounts, including profiles, photos, chat and messages. Symantec, the security firm, discovered...
Law not quite so sunny as parallel importing case overturned due to brand owner’s failure to publish information regarding origin – Oracle v M-Tech, Court of Appeal
M-Tech bought for resale second-hand computer hardware of Sun Microsystems. Oracle (which has since taken over Sun’s business) objected on the basis that the goods had not been put on the market within...
Sports gear company discovered legal victory was in the pocket – Hudson Bay v Umbro, Court of Appeal
This case surrounded two licences to make and sell Umbro’s football clothes in the US. One licence (to Dick’s) was for the exclusive sale of on-field sports clothing and the other (to Hudson Bay) was...
Information Commissioner issues code of practice for online behavioural advertising
The Information Commissioner’s Office – the UK’s data protection regulator – has issued a code of practice dealing with online behavioural advertising issues. Online behavioural advertising refers...
Goods with label saying ‘Not For Sale’ and ‘Demonstration’ could not be sold in EEA without owner’s consent – Coty Prestige v Simex Trading, European Court of Justice
Coty made and marketed perfumes under its trade marks such as Lancaster and Joop! It used a selective distribution system to sell those goods. Simex was not an authorised seller but it had provided goods...