Defamation | Matthew Arnold & Baldwin LLP | Giving you a lot more than just law...

Latest news and views tagged defamation

RSS

Google not liable for allegedly defamatory comments posted on its hosted service when brought to its attention as they were still disputed by the author – Davison v Habeeb and Google, High Court

20 December 2011 | Paul Gershlick

Google was not liable for allegedly defamatory comments posted about Davison on Google’s hosted service at blogger.com, despite the online service giant having kept the comments up even after being told...

Tags on this discussion: defamation defamatory e-commerce E-Commerce Directive E-Commerce Regulations electronic commerce (EC directive) regulations Electronic Commerce Directive High Court host hosting Internet service provider libel libellous libelous On-line Online online content take-down take-down policy web web content web postings web site web sites web-host webhost Website website content websites

Call for Google to review its take-down policies

11 November 2011 | Mark Weston

Google has been asked to review its policy on taking down online reviews of businesses amid growing concerns of the number of fake reviews that are being published. The call comes after a business owner...

Tags on this discussion: business business review business reviews defamation Google Internet Online online posts online review online reviews take-down policies take-down policy verification verification process web web site web sites Website website content websites

Rise in requests for content removal from Google

2 November 2011 | Mark Weston

As part of it bi-annual transparency report, Google has revealed that, for the period of January to June of this year, there has been a 71% increase in requests for content to be removed from its services,...

Tags on this discussion: content content removal data data protection defamation Google illegal infringement Internet national security Online online content privacy removal of content security unauthorised unlawful web web site web sites Website website content websites YouTube

MPs Committee proposes that websites can keep up allegedly defamatory postings if written by identified authors and accompanied by complaints

27 October 2011 | Mark Weston

An MPs’ report on the draft Defamation Bill going through Parliament has proposed that a distinction be drawn for online libel purposes between identified authors and anonymous posters. The situation...

Tags on this discussion: defamation Defamation bill Internet use Internet user libel Libel Reform Bill libellous libelous On-line Online online content postings take-down UGC user-generated content web web content web postings web site web site content web sites web-host webhost Website website content websites

If you don’t like the heat, get out of the kitchen – Court of Appeal rules in favour of disclosure of private issues against ex-Gordon Ramsey employee after conducting public quarrel – Hutcheson v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal

30 July 2011 | Simon Weinberg

Gordon Ramsey and an ex-employee, Christopher Hutcheson, had a public fight after the famous chef had dismissed him for misconduct. Hutcheson had used company funds for private purposes, but the parties...

Tags on this discussion: Airtlcle 10 Article 8 Court of Appeal defamation defamatory ECHR European Convention for Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights free speech freedom of expression High Court HRA Human Rights Act injunction injunctive injunctive relief interim injunction libel libellous libelous privacy privacy complaints privacy injunction privacy issues right to privacy

Lawyer-shaming website finds out what Solicitors from Hell really means

25 July 2011 | Paul Gershlick | 3 comments

One thing that’s probably not a good idea is trying to take on the whole legal profession in an explosive issue that they all feel strongly about – their professional reputations. Well, Solicitors...

Tags on this discussion: content defamation defamatory libel libellous libelous On-line Online online content postings user-generated content web web content web postings web site web site content web sites Website website content websites

Government consults on draft Defamation Bill

22 March 2011 | Paul Gershlick

The Government has introduced a draft Defamation Bill and is consulting on it. Amongst the proposed changes to defamation law are the following: ¨ A requirement to show substantial...

Tags on this discussion: defamation Defamation bill defamatory fair comment honest opinion Internet Internet access Internet connection Internet service provider Internet service providers Internet use Internet user ISP libel libel tourism libellous libelous Online online content qualified privilege responsible publication single publication single publication rule web web site web sites Website website content websites

Defamation settlement over quick-fire allegations about election rival demonstrates Twitter dangers

19 March 2011 | Mark Weston

It was a case of one political victory to one candidate and one court victory to the other in a couple of election day battles. Colin Elsbury had beaten Eddie Talbot in a closely contested Welsh council...

Tags on this discussion: defamation defamatory libel libellous libelous Online online content tweet twitter web web site web sites Website website content websites

Judge refuses to require online newspaper to disclose anonymous posters’ details over ‘pub talk’ comments after article– Clift v Clarke, High Court

3 March 2011 | Paul Gershlick

After Ms Clift had successfully sued Slough Council for defamation proceedings, the Daily Mail newspaper ran a story about the case. In correspondence, Ms Clift described the newspaper’s report as excellent....

Tags on this discussion: defamation disclosure High Court HRA Human Rights Act Internet libel Norwich Pharmacal Order Online online content privacy proportionate right to privacy web web site web sites Website website content websites

Facts get lost in the translation as untrue email in political spat leads to £30,000 damages – Cambridge v Makin, High Court

18 January 2011 | Paul Gershlick

Two interpreters were involved in a spat that has led to a big payout in damages after one of the emails sent contained untrue allegations about the other. Cambridge was an interpreter on the board of...

Tags on this discussion: damage damages defamation email emails High Court libel libellous libelous Online

Page 1 of 312 3 »

Latest news and views tagged defamation

Google not liable for allegedly defamatory comments posted on its hosted service when brought to its attention as they were still disputed by the author – Davison v Habeeb and Google, High Court

Call for Google to review its take-down policies

Rise in requests for content removal from Google

MPs Committee proposes that websites can keep up allegedly defamatory postings if written by identified authors and accompanied by complaints

If you don’t like the heat, get out of the kitchen – Court of Appeal rules in favour of disclosure of private issues against ex-Gordon Ramsey employee after conducting public quarrel – Hutcheson v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal

Lawyer-shaming website finds out what Solicitors from Hell really means

Government consults on draft Defamation Bill

Defamation settlement over quick-fire allegations about election rival demonstrates Twitter dangers

Judge refuses to require online newspaper to disclose anonymous posters’ details over ‘pub talk’ comments after article– Clift v Clarke, High Court

Facts get lost in the translation as untrue email in political spat leads to £30,000 damages – Cambridge v Makin, High Court

Contact us

View latest Upload

Subscribe to Upload

Employer Helpline

Events

News