<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Arnold &#38; Baldwin LLP &#124; Giving you a lot more than just law... &#187; heterosexual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mablaw.com/tag/heterosexual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mablaw.com</link>
	<description>MAB</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A rose by any other name&#8230;.?</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/a-rose-by-any-other-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Messenger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterophobic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Tatchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=1761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A  man and woman wish to be the first  heterosexual couple to enter into a civil partnership. Despite wishing to have the same legal rights as any husband and wife, the couple have indicated that they do not want to collude &#8220;with the segregation that exists in matrimonial law&#8221; between civil partnerships and marriage. As the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A  man and woman wish to be the first  heterosexual couple to enter into a civil partnership. Despite wishing to have the same legal rights as any husband and wife, the couple have indicated that they do not want to collude &#8220;with the segregation that exists in matrimonial law&#8221; between civil partnerships and marriage. As the Civil Partnership Act 2004 was brought into force in order to afford same sex couples the same rights and responsibilities as heterosexual couples, the only benefit would appear to be in the name. Peter Tatchell, a human rights campaigner supports and applauds the couple&#8217;s heterophobic challenge. The question remains, what&#8217;s in a name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/a-rose-by-any-other-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

