Latest news and views tagged liability
RSS
Sony has required its PlayStation Network users to sign up to new terms and conditions that would amount to their waiver of the right to take part in collective legal action, or so-called “class action...
Agent’s failure to name principal correctly does not mean agent can be sued – Knight Frank v Du Haney, Court of Appeal
D was an agent for M. D engaged KF to be a surveyor to provide services for M. D always made clear that he was an agent and for M, but he mis-named M’s legal name when he signed a contract on M’s behalf....
L’Oréal battle with eBay worth it as ECJ delivers stunning victory for the cosmetics brand in battle against trade mark infringers – L’Oréal v eBay, European Court of Justice
Some two years ago, the High Court ruled that eBay would not be jointly liable for trade mark infringements by its users who sold infringing products on its website. However, the ruling was referred to...
NetTV decision over liability for deliberate repudiatory breach considered by High Court together with right of first refusal, whether rights are waived while negotiating following material breach and very narrow interpretation of limit on liability clause – AstraZeneca v Albemarle International, High Court
When drafting a contract, parties often attempt to exclude or limit their liability by inserting a particular clause into the contract. Such a clause is known as an exclusion clause. Certain forms of exclusion...
Another case shows that many types of economic loss are direct and do not fall within exclusion of liability for indirect losses – McCain Foods v Eco-Tec, High Court
This case involved the supply of a system by Eco-Tec to McCain. McCain wanted the system to remove hydrogen sulphide so that it could generate heat and electricity. The system was defective. McCain claimed...
Industry standard? Must be reasonable then – Röhlig (UK) Ltd v Rock Unique Ltd, Court of Appeal
The Court of Appeal has ruled that clauses in the standard trading terms of a particular trade industry body were reasonable under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA). The ruling upholds the decision...
Public body ordered to disclose IT contract against its wishes
The Department of Work and Pensions has been ordered by the Information Tribunal to disclose most of the details of an IT contract. Atos Origin had been the only bidder for the DWP’s contract. After...
Series of cumulative breaches can amount to fundamental breach, and Court of Appeal shows narrowness of what counts as indirect losses – GB Gas v Accenture, Court of Appeal
GB Gas entered into an agreement with Accenture for Accenture to design, supply, install and maintain a business-critical IT system, including billing. The agreement defined a ‘Fundamental Defect’...
Honest belief of something means party could not be deemed to have made fraudulent misrepresentation – FoodCo v Henry Boot, High Court
HB commissioned a third party to provide a report on likely traffic and footfall at a new motorway service station. HB used that report to provide a brochure to attract tenants. The numbers turned out...
Liability cap in contract includes contractual interest but excludes statutory interest – Markerstudy v Endsleigh, High Court
Endsleigh provided certain administration and claims handling services to Markerstudy. Markerstudy claimed for losses resulting from Endsleigh’s alleged overpayment in relation to the claims. There was...