<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Arnold &#38; Baldwin LLP &#124; Giving you a lot more than just law... &#187; propety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mablaw.com/tag/propety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mablaw.com</link>
	<description>MAB</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>All bar one</title>
		<link>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/all-bar-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/all-bar-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Messenger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying a New Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying a new home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohabitation Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living Together]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficial interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entitlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial contribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mablaw.com/?p=1457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A female barrister who had been cohabiting with her partner for a significant period but had not contributed financially to the purchase price of the property in which they lived, was held in December 2009 not to be entitled to a beneficial interest in it. Despite having made loans to her partner, as they had not been expressed as entitling her to an interest, she [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A female barrister who had been cohabiting with her partner for a significant period but had not contributed financially to the purchase price of the property in which they lived, was held in December 2009 not to be entitled to a beneficial interest in it. Despite having made loans to her partner, as they had not been expressed as entitling her to an interest, she failed to establish her entitlement. She did however get to keep the engagement ring. Ladies, let this be a warning to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mablaw.com/2010/01/all-bar-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

