Latest input tagged Terms & conditions
RSS feed for Terms & conditions
After 7 years in the legal arena, including 110 days in the courtroom, Sky has finally proved fraud against EDS.
On 26 January 2010, the Technology and Construction Court in London ruled that EDS had...
US court says online terms and conditions enforceable even without having to tick a check-box
A US court has ruled that online terms and conditions could be enforceable even where the user did not have to do something specific to show that she had read them. In this particular case, Victoria Major...
Applicability of jurisdiction clause by reference needs to be absolutely clear if incorporated by reference to another contract – AEL v Socofi, High Court
This case had complex facts and several parties involved, but the main players were AEL (a liner carrier between Africa and Europe), Socofi (a French fruit importer) and DAM (a fruit grower in Africa)....
Apple agrees to change Terms and Conditions to comply with consumer contracts laws
Apple Inc has agreed to the Office of Fair Trading's request to change its terms and conditions in order to comply with the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. The 1999 Regulations require...
In dealing with battle of the forms, a traditional contract analysis should apply unless clear evidence to the contrary – Tekdata v Amphenol, Court of Appeal…
G was a long-term supplier to Rolls Royce. G bought items from B, which in turn bought components from S. The relationships had been in place for many years. Over the years, G had required B to obtain...
Kraft/Cadbury deal prompts calls for reform of takeover laws
Italian prison sentences for Google executives for user-generated material sends shockwaves across the Internet
Need advice on a compromise agreement?
Litigation project management - a new way of estimating costs
Computer games designer’s failure to disclose his previous ideas meant employing company owned them – Burrows v Smith, High Court
Computer games designer’s failure to disclose his previous ideas meant employing company owned them – Burrows v Smith, High Court
"Fit notes" to be launched in April 2010
As an employer, have you the right to defend your property?
Framework to provide greater certainty on tax policy
A good compromise?